Fix #14

Playing Settlers and reading McGonigal’s book has helped me understand in more detail what it takes to live. It would be nice if we could play the game; The Long View, she refers to but current obstacles are not surmountable, yet. In the real world, entrepreneurs have always been the ones with the long view, those that could see the future, even beyond their own, and we have corporations, and buildings to attest to that. Playing the game and thinking about this made me think that we all need to be entrepreneurs in our own lives, how we live and manage the obstacles we encounter and look beyond them. Soon after I began playing this game, I encouraged a friend’s 16-year-old grandson to play with the hope that we could have a discussion later about what he learned. I wanted him to see the interconnectedness of the supply chains to the expansion of community, and the need for resource management and then be able to translate that to his own worldview, his needs, and wants. In doing this, having those discussions, I realized how much I personally was not recognizing those obstacles and long view in my own life.

We see it on the news almost daily of how areas of our ecosystem are damaged by human or natural actions, but we invariably dismiss it and do not see how it relates to our own lives. I wanted Jeremy, my friend’s grandson to see how doing one thing can have negative or positive outcomes in many unexpected ways. I believe I have seen a small light of understanding on his part in our talks, but my own light has come into sharp relief. This is how I want my students to see the world, beyond their own needs and wants, to recognize the bigger picture and continue to open their eyes to possible futures that they have the power to create. I want them to know, that right now, they are engaging in what McGonigal refers to as pilot experimentation, and now is the time to try small things to see what changes can be made, safely in their own lives.  Games, in the right context, can empower them to do that. One example that was offered this week was the “what if game,” World Without Oil. I can see some kind of variation of this would work well in the classroom with the use of media to let them be creative in their expression of ideas to help solve smaller problems in their own life.

Choosing only three concepts from the book is a difficult task, but the author sums it up best in her conclusions on page 350: “Good games can play an important role in improving our quality of life. They support social cooperation and civic participation at very big scales. And they help us lead more sustainable lives and become a more resilient species.” Who could ask for more?

Fix 13

My time spent with the Settlers game has shown me the collaborative efforts of the players to reach a common goal. In order to succeed, one must cooperatively coordinate or synchronize with other players to identify a common goal in order to co-create a desired outcome, one that no one player could have accomplished on their own. My last adventure, The Dark Priests, required the collaboration of one other player. Neither of us knew what we were doing and as a result, we did not succeed, but we sure did learn a lot. I look forward to more combined adventures now that I know a little more of what to expect.

As McGonigal notes (pg. 271), “We have a hardwired desire and capacity to cooperate and coordinate our actions with others, to actively immerse ourselves in groups and to actively cocreate positive shared experiences.” This is certainly borne out in my personal experience with cooperative learning groups in my classroom. Translation of skills learned in cooperative learning or gaming environments, amounting to the 10,000+ hours of practice required for extraordinary status, to real world situations that require these Collaboration Superpowers that McGonigal refers to, should make for a much better prepared group of problem solvers we will need in the future.

McGonigal refers to a definition of “shared intentionality” as “the ability to participate with others in collaborative activities with shared goals and intentions” (pg. 270). I do not believe that this is solely a “distinctly human capacity” (pg. 260). She refers to the research, stating that no other intelligent species is capable of this quality. From bees and ants to African Wild Dogs and coyotes, all cooperate and learn from each other for their common good. Perhaps, we are the only species cognizant of our intent to cooperate, but I do not believe we are alone in its application.

A few years ago, a friend was telling me about his gaming experiences and I was convinced that this was something I wanted to try. I bought the Xbox w/Kinect and a number of games to go along with it, including the newest Call of Duty. This was an expensive lesson for me as I did not have the requisite coordination skills to operate the controller and did not enjoy these games and now they sit here unused. I get more pleasure watching my nephews play these games than I ever got playing them myself. I think that as soon as I get the okay from their mother, I will transfer the whole thing to them. My younger nephew, who is nine, is very adept at the online aspect of the games and is fearless when it comes time to “ping” another player for help or just chat. I look forward to seeing how these experiences will affect his behavior in the future in terms of cooperation and collaboration.

Fix 11-12

Settlers’ is a microcosm of what McGonigal describes as an engagement economy of an epic scale like Wikipedia or World of Warcraft. Is it a good game world? The game does invite you to explore, act, and spend large amounts of time and encourages curiosity, and collaboration to achieve your goals. The game mechanics are adequate insofar as response times to player actions and has a personal feedback system that demonstrates progress. The game community has many facets in which to engage players. Through guild quests and guild tasks, one has the sense of community, of helping one another out in time of need. Nowhere though, does that sense of community and shared responsibility manifest itself than in a shared adventure.

Participating in this kind of quest allows you to feel that, as part of a team, you can accomplish many more things than you would even think about doing on your own. While I would not refer to these adventure wins as ‘epic, I can get a glimpse of how participation in something like the Guardian’s “Investigate Your MP’S Expenses” would make someone feel being a participant in the effort. I love the idea of Social participation tasks and the one I particular McGonigal mentions as her favorite (pg. 253), Christel House and the short note to a student somewhere in the world that might need a small pat on the back before a big test. Such a small gesture that could conceivably have a great impact on someone you will probably never meet let alone get to know. This reminds me of all the letters and notes written from classrooms, churches, and kitchen tables to our troops around the world. Speaking from experience, I know how much words of encouragement and love from a stranger means.

Crowd-sourcing has had my interest for some time. As an educator, I have been in constant search for ways to improve my instruction and classroom experience for my students. Today, in part due to “No child left behind,” every state has, as part of their department of education web pages, a host of standards based lesson plans and classroom activities that has been contributed by teachers. One of my favorite sites for interactive instructional sites internet4classrooms.com has a seemingly endless supply of teacher-vetted sites for all grade levels. Search Google for crowd-sourcing for educators and you might be there awhile. Another of my favorite sites is donarschoose.org, where a number of teachers I know have been successful in funding projects for their classrooms. 

Fix # 9-10

When it first happened, I was startled a bit. Why someone I do not know, from somewhere unknown to me, help me by giving up his or her resources. I did not know much about this game “Settlers” yet and nothing about the practices of being in a guild. Since then, I have experienced this many times and have reciprocated in kind. This reciprocity was obligatory for me at first and still is, but I have also done this because I enjoyed it. I was raised this way, too. I could see what McGonigal meant when she referred to positive participation furthering the interests of the whole community (pg. 172). Chatting with other players has been a great way to interact and further each other’s interests in the game. While I do not have any interest in carrying on a conversation  with others about things outside the game, I have watched with interest some of the discussions scrolling down the global chat window. This kind of interaction is no different than in a real world, face-to-face meeting and it shows a real form of fun with strangers.

When I received my first buffs from a stranger, I sent a thank you in response. I have not always been able to do this, but I try when time permits. On page 190, McGonigal talks about the “jen ratio” and the net gain or loss of positive interactions among people in a given space over time. Reflecting on this for a while, I realized that I took this kind of inventory early in a school year without a formal thought of doing it. If I notice a class is not meshing well, I will intervene to try to develop a more positive social exchange with each other. Often, this is accomplished through some type of game or activity that will give them an opportunity to complement each other or practice other social graces. These breaks are effective in producing a meaningful experience for them that translates to better behaviors in their academic interactions with each other. I suppose, now that I know what it is, I am guilty of happiness hacking my students.